Ashleyls17 00Q & Loki'd

RSS

Posts tagged with "lgbt"

May 2

bryonasaurusrex:

basically 

(Source: harveysbagel)

skinny-depression:

i love obama way too much

skinny-depression:

i love obama way too much

(Source: randomkiwibirds)

The Idea Bigots Fear: The possibility that David and Johnathan were in a homosexual relationship.

It is not that it “justifies” or is an “example” of a successful same-sex relationship/partnership. (Which isn’t the case because they did eventually part ways. Later on Johnathan died in battle.)

It is the fact that David and Johnathan were able to enter in a union of that nature and still have God’s favor. Not God’s judgement. God still loved them both. No matter whom they loved or were in love with.

In fact David became King; to rule over Judah. The land of God’s people. (Yes, he had his sins. I have yet to find a ruler in that period whom didn’t have their black marks.)

The Idea they fear is the fact that King David, who was indeed favored by God, was not punished or cased out of God’s favor for his relationship with Johnathan. God still loved him and gave King David many blessings throughout his life.

Basically stating that homosexuality is not a sin to begin with. Which contradicts what the hate-mongering church leaders are spewing to the masses from their pulpits on high. Acting as though they are better then those they serve. (Which is actually a sin within itself.)

Thankfully not all Christians, myself included, fallow these bigoted teachings blindly.

One day I hope things will change for the better. That love will be seen as love. Not something that should be vilified.

BIBLE: Books of Samuel: David and Johnathan’s Relationship. Simply Platonic or was it a Homosexual Affair?

ABOVE: Rainbows have been a source of inspiration for many. From Noah and his Ark with a promise from God to never have such a rain come again. All the way to the present day with people marching for their rights. Thought it was a bit fitting. (Picture Source HERE)

[Inspired by this post HERE]

Things of this nature will always be debated on in theological circles until the end of time. There are defiantly people out there with better “credentials” then myself to talk about this, but I thought why not give it a go anyway.

I’ve never been for having people of the Church (priests, pastors, reverends ect.) censer facts with their agenda and force feed them to me.

I encourage all to study the Bible, ask questions, and become informed about your faith as well as the beliefs of others. Its a big world. Don’t limit yourself.

This is just my view on the topic. Just like anything involving religion, faith, and the texts from them you are more then welcome to come to your own decisions and opinions. I’m going to share mine with you and I ask you to please keep and open mind and to respond civilly.

So here are my thoughts.

The story of David and Johnathan’s relationship can be found in the Books of Samuel. I am using the New International Version (NIV) translation of the Bible.

“After David had finished talking with Saul, Jonathan became one in spirit with David, and he loved him as himself. From that day Saul kept David with him and did not let him return home to his family. And Jonathan made a covenant with David because he loved him as himself. Jonathan took off the robe he was wearing and gave it to David, along with his tunic, and even his sword, his bow and his belt.” - 1 Samuel 18:1-4

This shows the start of at least some kind of intimate bond being formed between these two men.

I encourage you to read all of chapter 20 of the 1 book of Samuel. It made me cry. Johnathan was desperate to protect David from his father Saul’s plot to kill him. Johnathan checks to see if David is telling the truth about his father’s plan. Once Johnathan finds out it is true he sends David away.

41 After the boy had gone, David got up from the south side of the stone and bowed down before Jonathan three times, with his face to the ground. Then they kissed each other and wept together—but David wept the most. 42 Jonathan said to David, “Go in peace, for we have sworn friendship with each other in the name of the Lord, saying, ‘The Lord is witness between you and me, and between your descendants and my descendants forever.” Then David left, and Jonathan went back to the town.” - 1 Samuel 20:41-42

The passage above describes the parting. It is a very intimate with kissing and even declaring that the Lord witnesses the friendship and that their decedents even witness it. This seems to me to be a bond that has grown beyond the platonic. Almost like the parting of Romeo and Juliet.

In 1 Samuel 23 Saul is still chasing after David to kill him and is closing in.

15 While David was at Horesh in the Desert of Ziph, he learned that[a] Saul had come out to take his life. 16 And Saul’s son Jonathan went to David at Horesh and helped him find strength in God.17 “Don’t be afraid,” he said. “My father Saul will not lay a hand on you. You will be king over Israel, and I will be second to you. Even my father Saul knows this.” 18 The two of them made a covenant before the Lord. Then Jonathan went home, but David remained at Horesh.” - 1 Samuel 23:15-18

Johnathan and David care for each other a lot here. The line “second to you” is a bit ambiguous in meaning. It could be interpreted as second in command as an adviser or second in command because of their emotional connection.

This is the last time David will speak to Johnathan alive.

In 2 Samuel 1 David finds out that Saul and his son Johnathan are dead. David mourns and writes a letter.

In it he says: “25 How the mighty have fallen in battle! Jonathan lies slain on your heights. 26 I grieve for you, Jonathan my brother; you were very dear to me. Your love for me was wonderful, more wonderful than that of women.” - 2 Samuel 1:25-26

The last passage here pretty much sells it for me. These two men had a very deep, affectionate relationship. I think it was homosexual in nature if not then at the very least it was homosocial.

However, “Although David was married, David himself articulates a distinction between his relationship with Jonathan and the bonds he shares with women. David is married to many women, one of whom is Jonathan’s sister Michal, but the Bible does not mention David loving Michal (though it is stated that Michal loves David).” (Source)

In many respects it seems as though David had his wives for procreation and companionship. He has had a different type of love with Johnathan that in the text seems to be romantic in nature.

From my perspective anyway I see that they could by all rights have had a homosexual relationship. Which I find to be just great.

I will leave you to your own conclusions. :-) 

Apr 2

GENERAL HOSPITAL: 50th Anniversary and Why I Still Will Never Watch it.

Everybody in the US news media is going absolutely bonkers over the 50th Anniversary of General Hospital. (A Soap Opera in the USA for ABC)

Now I do see this as quite an accomplishment for the show’s cast and crew.

image

Bravo!

The thing that has been wholly pissing me off about it: They keep touting/talking about the wedding between Luke and Laura. “Luke and Laura’s November 17, 1981 wedding brought in 30 million viewers; it remains the highest rated soap opera episode in American daytime television history.” (Source)

However, about two years previous to the characters’ wedding, Luke RAPED Laura.

He RAPED her. Then the Producers & Writers had the audacity to have Laura fall ‘in love’ with her RAPIST. Which led to them getting marred to each other. They even had a child.

The News Coverage on the 50th constantly mentions the marriage between these two as a positive event,The wedding of their characters was seen by 30 million Americans.” (Source) Yet they all conveniently forget to mention that previously Luke raped Laura. That the show constantly concentrated on the ‘romance’ of their relationship instead of the nasty ‘reality’ of the rape. (Source)

image

So yet again mainstream/mass media is perpetuating Rape Culture by not confronting it. Instead they just gloss over it like everything was totally ‘normal’ about the couple. Choosing to use it as a bragging point for how ‘successful’ their program has been.

image

Around the same time as the General Hospital (ABC) Luke and Laura wedding, “In 1988, the serial [As The World Turns] made daytime television history by introducing daytime television’s first gay male character, Hank Elliot.” (SourceUnfortunately the character was kicked off after about a week because of the audiences negative reception of him because of his sexuality. There was also controversy over the fact that his partner had the AIDS virus. (His partner was never shown on screen.)  

Now a days Soap Opera’s like As The World Turns (CBS) [Luke & NoahLuke & Reid] and Guiding Light (NBC, CBS) [Olivia & Natalia] were constantly bashed by many critics and people in the industry for having LGBT characters involved in consensual romantic and or sexual relationships. (Although many fans of these programs supported them in this choice.)

So it is still considered socially as well as morally acceptable for a Rapist to marry his Victim. Yet, it is considered wrong to have CONSENTING ADULTS of the SAME SEX involved in sexual intercourse?

image

Yet another ‘fantastic’ job done by the news media outlets. *SARCASM*

[EDIT: Yes, I know Luke and Laura had more then 1 child over the course of their lives. I only mentioned the 1 because of him pertaining to the use of the Rape with the ‘flashback’ situation.

Yes, Luke and Noah got a ton of positive feedback from fans. As I previously stated. Critics and Industry responses are very different from fan response. As I also previously state.

IF YOU WRITE A RESPONSE TO ME MAYBE YOU SHOULD ACTUALLY READ THE ENTIRE POST INSTEAD OF SKIMMING IT.]   

The Seed Bigots Fear: The possibility that David and Johnathan were in a homosexual relationship.

It is not that it “justifies” or is an “example” of a successful same-sex relationship/partnership. (Which isn’t the case because they did eventually part ways. Later on Johnathan died in battle.)

It is the fact that David and Johnathan were able to enter in a union of that nature and still have God’s favor. Not God’s judgement. God still loved them both. No matter whom they loved or were in love with.

In fact David became King; to rule over Judah. The land of God’s people. (Yes, he had his sins. I have yet to find a ruler in that period whom didn’t have their black marks.)

The Seed they fear is the fact that King David, who was indeed favored by God, was not punished or cased out of God’s favor for his relationship with Johnathan. God still loved him and gave King David many blessings throughout his life.

Basically stating that homosexuality is not a sin to begin with. Which contradicts what the hate-mongering church leaders are spewing to the masses from their pulpits on high. Acting as though they are better then those they serve. (Which is actually a sin within itself.)

Thankfully not all Christians, myself included, fallow these bigoted teachings blindly.

One day I hope things will change for the better. That love will be seen as love. Not something that should be vilified.

The Seed They Fear: The possibility that David and Johnathan were in a homosexual relationship.

Is not that it “justifies” or is an “example” of a successful same-sex relationship/partnership. (Which isn’t the case because they did eventually part ways. Later on Johnathan died in battle.)

It is the fact that David and Johnathan were able to enter in a union of that nature and still have God’s favor. Not God’s judgement. God still loved them both. No matter whom they loved or were in love with.

In fact David became King; to rule over Judah. The land of God’s people. (Yes, he had his sins. I have yet to find a ruler in that period whom didn’t have their black marks.)

The Seed they fear is the fact that King David, who was indeed favored by God, was not punished or cased out of God’s favor for his relationship with Johnathan. God still loved him and gave King David many blessings throughout his life.

Basically stating that homosexuality is not a sin to begin with. Which contradicts what the hate-mongering church leaders are spewing to the masses from their pulpits on high. Acting as though they are better then those they serve. (Which is actually a sin within itself.)

Thankfully not all Christians, myself included, fallow these bigoted teachings blindly.

One day I hope things will change for the better. That love will be seen as love. Not something that should be vilified.

Mar 6

let's get a few things straight.

  • bisexual with a preference for the same sex does not mean "one foot out of the closet."
  • bisexual with a preference for the opposite sex does not mean "trying to get attention."
  • lesbian does not mean "masculine."
  • gay does not mean "feminine."
  • transgender does not mean "going through a phase."
  • transsexual does not mean "a disappointment." nor does it mean "gender identity confusion."
  • asexual does not mean "prude."
  • demisexual does not mean "prude."
  • pansexual does not mean "easy."
  • heterosexual does not mean "normal"
  • Your does not mean "you are"
  • Virgin does not mean *Prude*
  • Sexually Active does not mean *Slut*

ashleyls17:

DON’T FORGET to watch the new SyFy Lost Girl episode Monday (TONIGHT) @ 10/9C.

Feb 8
stfuconservatives:

jessicavalenti:

Shhhh…no one tell Fox News that the “wedding kiss” picture they’re using to accompany a piece about traditional gender roles is actually of a same sex couple. (MADE MY DAY)

AUDIBLE SNORT

stfuconservatives:

jessicavalenti:

Shhhh…no one tell Fox News that the “wedding kiss” picture they’re using to accompany a piece about traditional gender roles is actually of a same sex couple. (MADE MY DAY)

AUDIBLE SNORT